• about |
  • concepts |
    • the model
    • the life cycle
    • dimensions matrix
  • our services |
    • team alchemy diagnostic
  • resources |
  • network |
    • asia-pacific
    • europe
  • our clients |
    • client comments
  • contact us
Team Alchemy

Maggie Thatcher To Have Private(ised) Funeral...

15 Apr 2013    4 comments
Share this post on Linkedin
Share this post on Facebook

 

Margaret ThatcherAs the world digests the news of the passing of one of history’s most celebrated political leaders, brickbats and bouquets are flowing across the U.K. to Downing Street and Buckingham Palace in London.

As England’s first female Prime Minister and the first female leader of a major Western world state, Margaret Thatcher is an iconic symbol of Great Britain. The longest serving British Prime Minister of the 20th Century, Thatcher was also a divisive leader, whose policies and actions polarised a nation for eleven years from 1979 to 1990.

As a New Zealander I lived through and followed Margaret Thatcher’s leadership from the far side of the globe, and saw it close-up as a postgraduate student living in England in 1983. As I arrived in England for my postgraduate studies the British fleet arrived back from the Falklands War, and I remember being intrigued by the steely resolve of “The Iron Lady” and the response of my friends and colleagues at university. In what was to become a defining characteristic of her leadership and her public persona, Margaret Thatcher seemed to me to be a woman with an intense and burning ambition to realise her visions for a better England.

Much has been written about Margaret Thatcher in the days since her passing. Unsurprisingly, the reflections on her life and achievements are as diverse and polarised as they were while she was alive. I do not want to enter into debate about the merits of Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister. However, her passing is an opportunity to look back on one of the most impactful periods of political leadership seen on the global stage in the 20th century. 

Above all, Margaret Thatcher always struck me as a woman with a strong action orientation. She clearly had a very well defined vision for her nation, and operated with purpose in striving to attain that vision. Once she had decided on a course of action – whether it was a policy, a method of negotiation, a challenge to her beloved nation's security, or a response to a crisis – Margaret Thatcher set high standards for herself and her colleagues and consistently displayed an exemplary commitment to execution. I recently read an interesting anecdote which succinctly demonstrates Thatcher’s task-management, results-focused attitude: 

Recalling the Brighton bombing, (the IRA’s bombing of the Conservative Party conference which killed five and injured many) ex-Tory Minister Lord Deben told how he found Lady Thatcher on her hands and knees, peering round a door. He said she dusted herself down, before saying: “Right, we’d better get on with something.”  

Two of Margaret Thatcher’s extraordinary leadership strengths were her uncompromising and obvious drive combined with her clarity of vision. The Economist described her visionary conviction whilst she was campaigning for her third term in power:

"In her clear vision of the Britain she wants to create, Mrs Thatcher is unlike any of her predecessors. She is, in that sense, a revolutionary. It is a role which she stumbled upon almost by accident, an aspiration which has become more compelling with every passing year. Not only does she believe that she alone sees the reforms that still need to be made. She has a shrewd suspicion that much of what she has achieved could be reversed if she were now to leave Downing Street."

Faulklands War

Vision provides a roadmap and defines the destination. Thatcher was an almost textbook example of an autocratic leader, and it was through her extraordinarily strong character that she led her Cabinet, and country, along the roadmap towards converting her vision into reality. The label ‘autocratic’ is classic leadership terminology, however its application is fitting when referencing Mrs Thatcher. In many of the ‘watershed moments’ during Thatcher’s career she demonstrated classic traits of an autocratic leader. In confronting the Falkland's situation, in her refusal to compromise with either the IRA or the Miners Union, and throughout her process of privatisation Margaret Thatcher exhibited several of the key attributes of an autocratic political leader…

• Came into power at a time of crisis

• Clarity of thought and communication of a solution for the crisis 

• A compelling vision for the future - for her party and followers

• Minimal input from her key constituents, but strong buy-in and follow-ship from a passionate group of supporters

• Little time for consensus or group decisions.

• A polarisation of the general population

Perhaps Thatcher’s autocratic style of leadership is best summated through her own words:

“I don't mind how much my Ministers talk, so long as they do what I say.”

Many say that Margaret Thatcher left little chance to ‘like’ her – that through her “Iron” personality and conviction she polarised people to such an extent that she was either ‘loved’ or ‘loathed’. Personally, as an intrigued student of leadership I ‘liked’ watching Thatcher’s career. As a leader she was truly unique, unafraid to fight and take a stand for the vision which she had for a better Britain. During her time in power Thatcher commanded professional (though not always personal) respect and belief through action from her Cabinet and colleagues through her unwavering commitment to action and by setting high standards.

Margaret Thatcher

In standing alongside Churchill as one of Britain’s pre-eminent politicians, at a time of crisis for her nation, Margaret Thatcher’s legacy has been to leave her England, and the political and economic landscape of the world, in a vastly different form than she inherited it. Whether or not it is a better England or not depends on whom you speak to. However, what is unquestioned is that last week the world lost one of its great and unique leaders, who will be remembered for her vision and drive to realise it.

“Unless we change our ways and our direction, our greatness as a nation will soon be a footnote in the history books, a distant memory of an offshore island, lost in the mists of time like Camelot, remembered kindly for its noble past”. 

- Margaret Thatcher

- - - 

(As a leader Thatcher was able to incite emotion and opinion like few others. If you have any thoughts about Margaret Thatcher’s style of leadership, as always I’d love to hear about them below in the comments section.)

- - - 

References:

BBC News - David Cameron: Thatcher An Extraordinary Leader: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22086690

10 Iconic Moments of Margaret Thatcher’s Career: http://listverse.com/2013/04/08/10-iconic-moments-of-margaret-thatchers-career/

Leadership Styles: https://ironladyleadership.wikispaces.com/Leadership+Styles

Margaret Thatcher: Lords Recall A Kind Woman With Sense Of Humour: www.telegraph.co.uk ›

What The Economist Saw: http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/04/margaret-thatcher-1.

- - -

© 2013 Team Alchemy. Click here to read about the Team Alchemy writers.


Apr 15 2013
Share this post on Linkedin Share this post on Facebook

4 Comments · Make a comment

  • Mel Lyde
    Hard times
    15 Apr 2013 11:33

    Living through the Thatcher Years in Britain was "interesting". It was hard at the time. Even though you could understand that the medicine would benefit Britain, it certainly tasted bad. Some of what she did was needed and in hind-site the benefit could be seen. I admired her resolve but certainly did not admire the person. PMs that followed her seemed very wishy washy, even if they felt a little more palatable, they seemed to achieve very little. Like her or not, I am saddened by anyone "celebrating" her death, it seems inappropriate and in poor taste.
     - Mel Lyde

  • Trevor Laurence
    @ Mel - 'Hard Times'
    15 Apr 2013 19:41

    Mel, I like your analogy of taking foul tasting medicine to restore our good health - we hate it but know it's good for us (and it brings back childhood memories!). In life, most of us accept that at times leaders may take us in directions we may not choose to follow, however we accept that for the greater good it may be necessary. 'Maggie' was able to carry her early cabinet committees with her by her iron will, the power of her vision and her conviction; in the end her own 'team' (cabinet) rallied against her stances on Europe and the poll tax, forcing her hand to resign. Perhaps by her resolute commitment to do what she believed was 'right', she defeated herself. Her colleagues and the nation had tired of her combative rhetoric and perceived intransience. Regardless, Maggie stayed true to her beliefs and principles that over the previous decade had rebuilt Britain's economic competitiveness and restored Britain's influence on the international stage. In my view that's an extraordinary leader's job well done - and outstanding legacy left! So yes - definitely respected and admired. But a team alchemist? Methinks not!

     - Trevor Laurence

  • Bart Brichau - Microsoft
    Vision and Legacy
    16 Apr 2013 5:25

    Hey Trevor, I can't help but think of Mahatma Ghandi. Having a strong vision and being action oriented is one thing. The net effect of your legacy is - for me - the most important measure of "success". I don't believe that Thatcher's legacy (and hers is highly linked to Ronald Reagan's) is going to go down in history as positively as Ghandi's. After all, the mess our financial system is in and our current depression is mainly due to Thatcher's and Reagan's policy changes (after Nixon got rid of the gold standard). Finally, when I ask myself: is she someone who inspires people the way Ghandi does, my answer is : "no".

     - Bart Brichau

  • Trevor Laurence
    @ Bart - Vison and Legacy
    16 Apr 2013 9:51

    Well Bart, Ghandi vs Thatcher, that's some 1v1 leadership contest! If it was a boxing match I wouldn't like to be one of the judges, especially if the key criteria for winning is the legacy that is left for those who follow. I'm not sure that laying the mess of the present finacial system at Margaret Thatcher's feet is appropriate. That would be like giving Ghandi the accountability for the ongoing tension and outbreaks of conflict between India and Pakistan since the 1947 partition of India. As a student of leadership my question for each and every leader is, "how effective was this leader at setting and achieving a vision that aligned with what they believed in, and matched the challenges of their time/situation?" . This question takes away the ethical or moral issues from the equation and focuses attention on pure leadership. In this sense both Thatcher and Ghandi were outstanding transformational leaders of the 20th century who responded to the challenges in their societies and led successful transformational changes in line with what they believed. Did they achieve everything they wanted for their constitutents?- No. Were they able to 'finish' what they started? - No. Were there other (less desirable) associated costs or negative impacts involved? Yes. But in my view they still achieved greatly against what they believed and was required. And they left their societies stronger they they were than when they arrived on the scene. Maybe the failure lies more with the leaders (and their teams) who followed them and what they have (or have not) done as leaders since? What do you think?

     - Trevor Laurence

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *.

blog menu
  • Merry Christmas & Happy New Year from Team Alchemy
  • Is there Team Alchemy at the 2015 Rugby World Cup?
  • My Favourite Global Collaborative Events
  • Teamwork Lessons From The Animal Kingdom
  • Literature Review: Katzenbach & Smith
  • How Leaders MUST Change With Their Teams
  • How Virtual Teams Achieve Optimum Performance
  • Six Weeks To Alchemy! A Team Alchemy Case Study
  • The Generation Game
    • Thoughts From Europe
    • 4 Business Lessons From Germany’s World Cup Win
    • My Conflicting Feelings Toward The FIFA World Cup
    • Have You Seen A Better Acceptance Speech?
    • Are You The 'Gorilla Spotter' Of Your Team?
    • MH370 - The Perspective No-One is Talking About
    • Do You Have Wolves In Your Team?
    • Collaboration (& Red Bull) Gives You Wings...
    • My Own New Year Res(et)olutions
    • What 'Stomp" Can Teach Us About Collaboration
    • My "Personal Favourites Of 2013" List
    • "Breaking News" From Mid-Atlantic (Guest Blog)
    • The US Congress Shutdown - 3 Collaborative Lessons
    • Yachting & Teamwork
    • World Class Innovation, Teamwork & Technology
    • When To Cry Over Spilt Milk
    • Three More Red Flags To High Performance Teamwork
    • Why Teams Fail - Are You Doing These Things?
    • E-Reputations, 'SuperRabbits' & Online Trust
    • Trust & Respect In The Locker Room...
    • "We Knocked The Bastard Off"
    • Maggie Thatcher To Have Private(ised) Funeral...
    • What To Learn From A (Red) Bull In A China Shop?
    • Do Your Star Players Make Or Break Your Team?
    • When Teamwork Doesn't NOT Work
    • Hollywood Collaboration
    • LIEstrong
    • 2012's Top Four (Lighthearted) Teamwork Videos
    • Enabling High Performance Through Collaboration
    • My 2012 Business Christmas Wishlist
    • Amazed by The Paralympics? Try the Paraorchestra!
    • European Launch & Collaboration for Team Alchemy
    • "Reset" Your Team
    • Team Alchemy On Two Wheels
    • Physics * The Law of Momentum * Team Performance
    • Calibrate Your Team: from vision to performance
    • 6 Steps to Team Traction (& the worst movie ever)
    • Your Input Is Requested!
    • What Stops Us Collaborating?
    • Lord Of The Collaboration
    • Collappleation
    • Collaboration: Five People, One Guitar
    • Paint Ball Guns, Falling Pianos & Team Alchemy
    • Gillard vs Rudd: A Lesson In Trust & Respect
    • Welcome to the Team Alchemy Blog!
subscribe to our blog
subscribe to our blog
inspiration
A team is more than a collection of people. it is a process of give and take.
Barbara Glacel & Emile Robert jnr
  • © 2022 Team Alchemy. All rights reserved.